Home
Facts on "Facts"
Reviews
From the Alumnae
What You Can Do
Sign the Petition
Other Links
About Us

Some Quick Facts:
 
  • Archaeologist David Ussishkin is familiar with the allegations leveled by Nadia Abu El Haj - of politicized archaeology and the deliberate destruction of upper (Islamic) layers out of nationalist motives in the dig he headed in the Jezreel Valley: "I don't remember meeting Nadia el-Haj during the excavations. All her accusations are based on talks with anonymous participants after the excavations. She did not study the excavation reports nor approached the directors of the project to ask their views. This is not a proper and serious way of research."
  • Jonathan Burack, writing at Family Security Matters, is the latest academic to contribute a scathing review of Nadia Abu El-Haj's: "Enter Nadia Abu El-Haj, the Barnard assistant professor of anthropology who has, in her 2001 book, ignored many facts and instead accused Israeli archaeology of inventing the Jews’ right to Israel. This woman is up for tenure at Barnard, and if you do not like the idea of granting such an honor to America’s and her allies’ enemies, then contact Barnard now.

    ...El-Haj is not a practicing archaeologist. She hardly knows the Hebrew in which many Israeli archaeological debates are conducted. She has taken part in very few actual digs. Yet she confidently condemns Israeli archaeology as a tool of the Zionists. With only gossip to go on, she accuses one archaeologist of bulldozing non-Jewish strata to get to the levels that might offer details about ancient Israel. Bizarrely, she then concludes her book by reversing herself on such desecration, asking us to "understand" sympathetically the Palestinian mob that destroyed Joseph’s Tomb on October 8, 2000.

    ...Lately, she has also embarked on genetic ancestry testing among Israel’s Jews in order to explore "race, diaspora and kinship." Will she seek to prove that Israelis today have no genetic link to the ancient Israelites and therefore no claim to their Jewish homeland?

More Articles

The following is a list of articles about the many inaccuracies and falsehoods found in Nadia Abu El Haj's dissertation. Taken as a whole, had someone bothered to really research her work before she was given a professorship at Barnard and certainly before her tenure application was seriously considered, one would have to conclude that Abu El Haj does not belong at a prestigious university such as Columbia.

Sadly, even the president of Barnard admits to having read only "most" of the book (to several different alumnae/i), but promised to read the rest over winter break...months after the controversy had erupted.

For this reason, the Deny Abu El Haj Tenure Committee urges you to read these articles and those in the Peer Review section and then sign the petition to deny Abu El Haj tenure. Barnard has already fumbled the ball...it is now firmly in the hands of Columbia University. The first step - will they appoint real scholars, versed in Abu El Haj's field, to the tenure committee, or will they do, as Barnard did...offer this important task to

Many more coming soon...

2007 Copyright: Deny Abu El Haj Tenure Committee